Skip to documentation
Browse documentation
Using Wingman

Marking & review

See each decision alongside the working it refers to.

Start with clear source documents

Upload your completed question paper as work and its mark scheme as scheme. Keep all relevant instructions and pages legible. PDF, PNG, JPEG and WebP are supported; each file can be up to 25 MiB. PDFs can contain up to 80 pages; images contain one page.

A session can hold up to 100 files and 300 MiB in total. Marking a single question can use up to 12 work pages and 12 scheme pages. The paper workflow supports up to 24 questions.

Request automated marking

Wingman prepares a rubric from the supplied scheme, assesses the visible working against each allocation and calculates a result. Automated marking runs in the background and uses your account’s existing allowance.

A queued or running response is not a finished result. Wait until the questions are completed, need review, failed or cancelled. If a question fails, inspect its error and source documents before starting again.

Read the result

Each allocation has a mark code, a decision, an explanation and supporting evidence. Select a mark to inspect its location on the scan. You can review decisions and add marks or comments using the normal paper viewer.

An uncertain allocation stays visible as needing review. A score range shows awarded marks through possible marks; its upper end is not a confirmed score. Method dependencies and the rubric’s conditions affect the result.

Externally marked work

Papers marked by you or another AI can be imported. The source is recorded, and the same viewer displays their rubric, evidence, decisions and review state.

Importing validates the structure and relationships in the submitted marking. It does not certify the mathematical judgement or independently re-mark the paper. Neither automated nor imported marking is an official Edexcel examination result.